FURTHER IDEATION💡
After week 2, we:
Started ideation ➝ Decided on the topic to explore ➝ Carried out literature review ➝ Identified gaps and/or opportunities to work on.
Moving forward to week 3, we will be continuing with ideation and ideas selection using meta-cognition thinking skills 'Generating Possibilities' and 'Evaluation' to find solutions to addressing the research gap.
Using SCAMPER! this was what we came up with:
Substitute:
- Use of mechanical composter instead of an automated composter.
- Addition of Carbon rich waste into composter, while removing some nitrogen waste. (Ensure that the ratio of carbon to nitrogen rich waste is 2:1)
- Substitute use of bones for compost to ground bones.
Combine:
- Combining food waste with other chemicals to produce
- Biofuels;
- Biodegradable materials;
- Perfumery and Cosmetic products.
- Combine food waste and compost producing better fertilisers.
- Combine with enzymes that removes harmful bacteria, to turn into skincare products.
Adapt:
- Include a dehumidifier for climates that are much more humid.
- Provide conducive environment for growth so that composting can occur more readily.
- Fermenting of food waste to make environmentally friendly soap.
Modify:
- Adjust the size of the composters in order to accommodate for larger volumes of food waste at once.
Put into another use:
- Reuse food waste as multipurpose, environmental friendly packaging for food products.
- Used tea leaves can be reused as natural cleaning agents.
Eliminate:
- Eliminate liquids from food waste
- Eliminate the packaging of the waste products by eco-friendly means. (e.g. plastic packaging can be recycled)
- Eliminate any unusable parts of the food waste. (e.g. mould)
Reverse:
- Turning and manufacturing food waste into pet food.
- Turning and reusing food waste as cattle feed.
Feasibility analysis:
- Budget
- How much does it cost?
- Project timeline
- Can a project be completed within the stipulated timeframe?
- Technical Feasibility
- Is the project feasible within the limits of current technology?
- Does the technology exist at all?
- Does the lab have sufficient space to support the project?
- Are the required utilities available?
- does it need any computer software and hardware?
- Operational Feasibility
- Does the project team have sufficient manpower to carry out the project?
- Is it legal to operate the project?
- Is it safe to operate the project?
Idea : Production of environmental friendly soap by fermenting fruit and vegetable waste. | YES | NO |
Budget - Less than S$2000? | ✓ |
|
Project Timeline - Can be completed within one semester? | ✓ |
|
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. |
| |
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
|
| ✓ |
| ✓ |
|
|
| ✓ |
| ✓ |
|
Operational Feasibility |
|
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
Idea : Provide a conducive environment for bacteria growth so that composting can occur more easily. (plant humidifier to increase humidity) | YES | NO |
Budget - Less than S$2000? | ✓ | |
Project Timeline - Can be completed within one semester? | ✓ |
|
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. |
|
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
|
| ✓ |
| ✓ |
|
Operational Feasibility |
|
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
Idea : Combing of fruit waste that are wasted and not sold to consumers to create perfumery and cosmetic products. | YES | NO |
Budget - Less than S$2000? |
| ✓ |
Project Timeline - Can be completed within one semester? |
| ✓ |
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. |
|
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
Operational Feasibility |
|
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
Idea : Reuse food waste as multipurpose, environmentally friendly packaging for food products. | YES | NO |
Budget - Less than S$2000? | ✓ |
|
Project Timeline - Can be completed within one semester? |
| ✓ |
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical feasibility of the project. |
|
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
| ✓ |
|
Operational Feasibility |
|
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
| ✓ |
|
- Cost
- Technology availability
- Ease of Operation
- Long-term benefits to Environment
- Ease of maintenance
|
Criteria |
Weightages (%) |
Options |
|||||
|
Upscaling of oil extracted from food waste into cosmetics |
Fermentation of fruit and vegetable waste to make soap |
Environmentally friendly packaging from
food waste |
|||||
|
Raw Score |
Weighted Score |
Raw Score |
Weighted Score |
Raw Score |
Weighted Score |
||
|
a. Cost efficient |
20 |
1 |
20 |
2 |
40 |
2 |
40 |
|
b. Availability of technology |
20 |
1 |
20 |
3 |
60 |
2 |
50 |
|
c. Ease of operation |
15 |
1 |
15 |
2 |
30 |
1 |
15 |
|
d. Long-term benefits to environment |
30 |
3 |
90 |
3 |
90 |
2 |
60 |
|
e. Ease of maintenance |
15 |
1 |
15 |
2 |
30 |
2 |
30 |
|
Score |
100 |
|
160 |
|
235 |
|
185 |
No comments:
Post a Comment